Column about Salmon Farming erroneous, uninformed
By Mary Ellen Walling, Courier-Islander September 21, 2011
Re: The Sockeye Salmon Murder Mystery, Ray Grigg, Sept. 16.
Mr. Grigg's recent column comparing salmon farming to murder suspects is erroneous, speculative, uninformed and offensive. Here are the real 'motives' of the industry in British Columbia: to work in a clean environment - that has to stay clean for us to be successful - to provide a healthy, efficient protein that will help to feed the world into the future, and to offer opportunities and stability for coastal communities who have been challenged by downturns in other sectors.
Mr. Grigg continues to criticize the industry in his columns and yet, he has never once contacted us to verify information - even after errors have been identified in his work. His uninformed columns do nothing to develop dialogue that can identify concerns and address them.
For example, he fails to talk about the strict import regulations that have protected BC's environment, or that salmon farming was here before international investment came to the area, or that experts have made clear during the Cohen commission that there are many challenges in applying studies from the Atlantic ocean to the Pacific ocean - or that when asked for further clarification, Dr. Kristi Miller said she had been pushed into saying the 'smoking gun' quote that has become a rallying call for anti-farm campaigners, and that while she thought her research may be a significant factor in the Sockeye question, that it was not 'the' factor.
Our members know there will continue to be those like Mr. Grigg who blindly oppose - but for those who are interested in understanding our operations, we are committed to sharing information, reaching out to have discussions, and as always, working together with collaborative partners to constantly improve our already-strong record.
For people in the public who would like to know the information that's actually being presented to the Cohen Commission of Inquiry into the decline of Fraser River Sockeye Salmon, the best place to look is on the commissions' website itself.
Transcripts are going up now for the dates that focused on aquaculture and each day's exhibits are also posted. The expert reports about salmon farming are also online there as well. Opinion columns in newspapers are important - but those opinions have to be accountable.
The hard-working men and women 'accused' in this latest yarn have been done a disservice by the Courier-Islander.
Mary Ellen Walling
Executive Director BC Salmon Farmers Association
PAA Reference Note: Read more on this topic at:
Cohen Commission Exhibit 1471 - PCR test results for infectious salmon anaemia virus (ISAV) in BC
http://www.farmfreshsalmon.org/blog/cohen-commission-exhbit-1471-pcr-test-results-infectious-salmon-anaemia-virus-isav-bc
Allegation about Disease is Blatantly False
http://www.farmfreshsalmon.org/blog/allegation-about-disease-blatantly-false
Gary D. Marty, D.V.M., Ph.D.
Fish Pathologist Animal Health Centre BC Ministry of Agriculture
also responded to the Grigg column. Read more at:
Grigg was wrong about Salmon Farming
http://www.farmfreshsalmon.org/grigg-was-wrong-about-salmon-farming
Mary Ellen Letter was in response to the following:
The Sockeye Salmon Murder Mystery
By Ray Grigg, Special to Courier-Islander September 16, 2011
The puzzle of British Columbia's disappearing Fraser River sockeye is unfolding like a classical murder mystery. Suspects abound.
Suspicion has fallen on such culprits as atypical ocean predators, unusual algae blooms, overfishing, inadequate food supplies, and threatening high temperatures in both marine and river ecologies. Each suspect has been carefully investigated and each may have inflicted some injury on the hapless sockeye. But the prime suspect is the salmon farming industry, the Norwegian corporations that have located multitudes of open net-pens in BC's West Coast waters - many crucially situated along the migration routes of the victimized sockeye.
The salmon farming industry possesses the three primary characteristics that make it the prime suspect in this murder investigation: motive, opportunity and means.
The motive is profit. Corporations have discovered that open net-pens are the most lucrative way of rearing farmed salmon. When Norway tightened restrictions on its salmon farming industry because of the proliferation of diseases and parasites in North Atlantic wild salmonids, Norwegian corporations saw their profits being constrained by controls and costs. Their quest for continuing expansion and profit was curtailed.
The perfect opportunity for expansion and profits appeared in coastal BC. The province was eager to boost coastal economies with a new industry, the waters were pristine and cold, regulations were minimal, and supervision was casual, trusting and accommodating. The corporations, of course, promised investment and jobs. This new environment was open, innocent and unburdened by the experience and disasters that had occurred in the North Atlantic. BC was the perfect opportunity to expand the industry and satisfy ever-hungry shareholders.
Corporate character and history are also relevant in this murder mystery. When salmon farming was known to cause environmental problems in North Atlantic waters, when countries such as Norway, Scotland, Ireland and England all had negative experiences with salmon farming, the Norwegian corporations knew that suspicion would likely fall on similar operations in BC. Indeed, parasites and diseases have plagued operations wherever open net-pen salmon farming has been practiced. If corporate practice transferred disastrous viral infections to Chilean waters, then precedent and logic must conclude that these same corporations and operations could bring similar problems to the West Coast. So the corporate defensive strategy has been to separate the events that have occurred elsewhere from those unfolding here.
In a global village interconnected by information sources, however, this strategy is transparently facile and obvious. Numerous independent Norwegian scientists, with long North Atlantic salmon farming experience, have repeatedly warned that the same problems occurring in open net-pen operations there are inevitable in BC. A conspicuous corporate strategy of separating the two situations only arouses suspicion - although evasion suggests guilt, suspicion itself is not incriminating.
Neither is it incriminating that the salmon farming industry always professes its absolute innocence, invariably denying any connection between its practices and any harm to BC's wild salmon. Its defensive strategy is to argue that no condemning studies are ever conclusive - even though many sea lice studies have repeatedly confirmed harm. Despite the overwhelming weight of incriminating circumstantial evidence, its corporate response is to encourage further investigation - ad nauseam. Repeat definitive studies. Get more data. Quibble about details. Solicit contradictory opinions. "Me thinks," as Hamlet said of his mother's guilt, "she doth protest too much."
No corporation engaged in a harmless practice needs a public relations company to polish an image, especially if that company is Hill and Knowlton, described as one of the world's slickest "spin machines" - the same one employed by tobacco companies to deny the cancerous effects of smoking, by Exxon to clean its reputation after its disastrous oil spill in Alaska, and by dictatorships to cover the blood and torture of abominable politics. Since the character of a reputable corporation speaks for itself, suspicion is automatically aroused when extreme measures are needed to improve a public image.
The last criteria for identifying a prime suspect is means - did the suspect have the capability of committing the crime? Open netpens containing millions of salmon in feed-lot conditions undeniably pollute the immediate benthic environment with feces, waste food, antibiotics and the toxins to control sea lice. And the natural sea lice cycle, sustained every year by the migration of wild mature salmon to spawning and death in their nascent rivers, is broken by the continual presence of salmon in farms. The consequent damage to out-migrating wild smolts has been repeatedly demonstrated.
The latest and most serious evidence in the sockeye salmon murder mystery is the possibility that corporations have brought lethal or debilitating viral infections to the West Coast.
Symptoms of infectious salmon anemia have been found. And Dr. Kristi Miller, a molecular geneticist who has been studying the decline of Fraser River sockeye - their diminishing returns happen to correspond to the placement of open net-pen salmon farms on their migration routes - has identified genetic markers that strongly suggest another unusual viral infection in wild fish. "It could be the smoking gun," she testified to the Cohen Commission established to investigate the mystery of the missing sockeye.
Judge Cohen has been receiving mounds of information, including reams of data about parasitic sea lice transferring from farmed to wild fish, and now new evidence suggesting fish farms have imported debilitating viruses to the BC's West Coast ecology. When his investigation is completed, he will deliberate and report on his findings. The prime suspect has not yet been convicted. But the mounting evidence is incriminating, and various accomplices are now implicated.
The plot thickens.
